Coffee

June 25, 2008

Coffee and coffee and coffee and food and coffee....

As always, the more going on, the less time I have to post about it. There's tons going on right now!

First of all, a huge round of applause for the new World Barista Champion, Stephen Morrissey of Ireland. Stephen is a great guy, and so dedicated to great coffee. He will be a great ambassador for our industry. I can't wait to see the wonderful things he does in the next year and beyond. Congrats to Stephen, U.S.A. champion Kyle, and all the great competitors! We all owe you so much!

Second, Bobbie and I had a great and delicious time on Saturday with our food and coffee pairing. As always, Bobbie outdid herself with the dishes. The prize for best dish was a close match between Bobbie's "breakfast quinoa" and the eminently edible steak and cheese sandwiches (I devoured mine like a hungry wolverine). But the dish that truly blew me away was the medium-boiled eggs with garden sprouts and fresh pea puree served with a Blue Batak Sumatra from Volcafé. I have been at this food-and-coffee pairing business for a while. I daresay I've done more of this than just about anyone in North America. And I can't say I have ever seen it nailed so well as Bobbie nailed it on Saturday. I kept going back and forth between the coffee and the puree, even rudely interrupting conversation, to taste the incredible similarities and contrasts. Wow! Thumbs up to Volcafe and the producers of the coffee, and double thumbs up to NYC's best-kept chef secret: Bobbie Marchand!!!

Thanks to Bobbie for doing all the work, Rachel G. for helping, and thanks to Cerise, Randal, Allie, Ashley and Ginnie for attending. (Ginnie has a rad science-writing blog here.)

Third, my colleague Willem Boot is in New York for two days on his way to Mexico for a conference on natural-processed coffees in Acapulco. We have big plans for the quality coffee scene in New York. I know I am more coy than revealing in these blog posts when it comes to future plans, but I'm not at liberty to say much now about our plans. But it will be cool! And it will result in better coffee for everyone in New York! Huzzah!

Fourth, the excellent and estimable Andrew Barnett of Ecco Caffé, of Santa Rosa, California, revealed to me last night that he's opening a roastery and café in New York City. AhhhhHHHH! Awesome. Anyone who knows me knows that I basically consider Andrew the pre-eminent coffee roaster in the United States. That he has been on the West Coast these two years that I have been on the East Coast has been a constant thorn in my coffee-loving side. There are many hurdles to clear and inspectors to placate in the meantime, but the knowledge that Ecco is on the way to Gotham makes me happy inside.

Go Andrew Barnett. Go Stephen Morrissey. Go Bobbie Marchand. Go Willem Boot. Go love it all.

June 20, 2008

Kyle Glanville at the WBC

Kyle gave a spot-on performance in the WBC first round in Copenhagen. Two interesting notes: He switched from the Finca Matalapa from El Salvador and instead went with the Santa Teresa from Panama... nice coffee! But I was surprised he made a change so soon after winning the US. Second, if you watch the video all the way through you hear Kyle tell the story of TSA deciding his grinder "looked like a missile" and dismantling it and then wrecking it when putting it back together while Kyle had to go through "security" at the airport. Sigh. (Though to be fair, Kyle does hate freedom).

Online Video provided by Ustream Finalists announced tomorrow.

Lily Pacas at the WBC

Awesome! Lily is a fifth-generation coffee person from El Salvador. She and her husband own Viva Espresso, where they have the best baristas in San Salvador. She is a member of the Pacas extended family, which has presence throughout the country, and for whom the pacas (and pacamara) varietals are named. Lily is a great friend and a wonderful hostess every time I visit El Salvador. What a strong performance she gives in Copenhagen!

Video clips hosted by Ustream

BoingBoing Video, Part Deux

Here's part two of Kyle and BoingBoing chilling at Intelligentsia... making espresso and making a vac pot. (sorry about the verizon ads)

Kyle is going at the WBC today (Friday), as is my good friend from El Salvador, the Salvadoran national champion, Lily Pacas. I'll post both their videos here. Or you can watch the live feed here.

June 17, 2008

Coffee Erotica

I've been compiling all the cupping data from the final round of March's Ethiopia Limited competition in Addis Ababa. This involves going through the score sheets of specific judges one by one and recording any notes they made on each individual coffee. Then we pass along this information to bidders so they have a little more cupping data beyond the raw scores.

Sounded like dull work when I started it, but it's turned out to be a lot of fun. Reading back through these score sheets, it's remarkable how distinct my memories of these coffees are. I'm just getting over a cold, too, and my inability to taste or smell anything in my immediate environment is probably contributing to my crystal clear recollections of the aromatics from three months ago.

If you've ever seen one of these auction offerings sheets, you may have been (as I remember being) a bit confused by the proliferation of descriptors. Some get repeated over and over. For instance, "sweet," is on just about every sheet. Well, for coffees that are scoring in the high 80's and 90's, I should hope so! Then you have your outliers that only one person noted (I will proudly own up to the mentions of "pineapple" you will see on this year's auction sheet).

Reading these is like reading coffee erotica. As distinct from espresso porn, which is an entirely visual arousal. This is the literary version.

Here's the entry for a typical sun-dried natural coffee, the #9-ranked Sidamo from Adam Bedane: berries, ripe cherries, sweet, vanilla, fresh butter, dark chocolate, oranges, tangerine, great snap, finishes smooth, citrus, sweet and fat

I leave off all the negative comments. They are few and far between, but they do pop up from time to time... with the washed coffees it's usually a hint of astringency or "youth" in the coffee; with the naturals it's usually a hesitant question about uniformity. Suffice to say these are outlier remarks too: if more than one judge detected something like this, the coffee wouldn't have scored high enough to make the finals.

I also, regrettably, must leave off most of the truly creative descriptors. So my note of "astonishing!!!" for the natural Korate from SMS is not on the list. Nor is Tracy Allen's note of "preacher's daughter," on Yitbarek Tilahun's washed coffee from Aleta Wondo.

So , while sloppiness in descriptors can make me cranky, let the court record show that I admit it's impossible not to find joy in things like the flavor of mango in a coffee. For the truly dorky, I'm transcribing every single descriptor from this list after the jump.

Continue reading "Coffee Erotica" »

June 16, 2008

Cool Video from BoingBoing

As part of my ongoing effort to completely abdicate my responsibility to post original content and to live vicariously through my former brother-in-portafilter-arms, Kyle Glanville, here is a cool video from BoingBoing (again with the coffee, BB!). It's a visit to the Intelly LA roastery. Also, the title of the video is "Part One," so if they post a part two, I suppose I have to follow suit.

Original post here.

June 05, 2008

Licking Sumatra

I have a new column up at Divine Caroline. It's about grouping coffees by origin. Here's an excerpt...

This happy rainbow of flavor factors is the reason for confusion that arises about coffee origins. It’s not just geography that differs. The plants and the traditions of the people who grow the coffee can also vary wildly, so two coffees from within the same country can taste radically different. And two coffees from countries thousands of miles apart can taste remarkably similar. In all, it’s a bit misleading of coffee roasters to just slap “BRAZIL” on a bag of coffee, as if that described the coffee. A commercial-grade robusta from the lowland plantations around São Paolo tastes quite literally like burnt rubber; a pulped-natural yellow bourbon from the highlands of Minas Gerais tastes quite literally like heaven.

Read the complete article here.

Misty Valley

Right now I am drinking a cup of Ethiopia Idido Misty Valley that one of our students brought from her roastery in South Korea. The class is over, but the coffee remains. When the class cupped it blind yesterday, it was the clear favorite.

The students have gone home and the lab is quiet. It's a sunny morning in Northern California, and I am sitting here in amid all these beautiful coffee roasters, sending a few phone calls to Ethiopia to try and secure a lot of coffee. All of a sudden I realized I was peckish for some actual brew. So, going through the sampling left over from the course, I was so happy to see the Misty Valley still there. I brewed it up in the Bunn (sneer not, specialty geeks... this thing is calibrated like a jet engine: clean perfect cups every time).

I had to leave the lab for a moment to go outside. When I came back in, the whole room smelled like lavender and jasmine and strawberries... just from one little pot of Misty Valley. What a precious little bean. My cup is light and crisp and so sweet, and of course fragrant.

What's really astonishing about this kind of coffee is how much of it there could be. Natural processed Yirgacheffes (like this one) are becoming more common. But to process them right and have them held out as separate lots and get them to an exporter who knows their value and get them on the ship into the ports cleanly and market them to roasters who will value them right and roast them right... so many chances to drop the treasure. People like Abdella Bagersh who make this all happen are heroes.

It's funny that the best coffee I have had this week came from Korea. Misty Valley is also the best coffee I had the week Café Grumpy was opening in Chelsea... we featured it for our grand opening. It's great that this amazing bean gets around so well in the little circle of specialty roasters. But this also shows us that more coffees are needed! Misty Valley is not the only one out there... it's just the one that has ended up in everyone's hands.

Mmmm, though... just took another sip. I'm not complaining at all.

June 04, 2008

Is Public Cupping Even Legit?

I have spotted a few interesting comment threads here and there in the corners of los internet the past couple of days having to do with cupping. Long fingers of the Gray Lady and all that.

It's sooooo hard to stay out of internet debates sometimes. But they can be so darned interesting. So even though I just spent all day cupping and roasting and then drinking wine and talking about the possibility of leasing land in the west of Ethiopia to grow geisha in the land of its birth (verdict: possible! but difficult!), I still just finished writing and re-writing a response to a great thread that's been going on for a few days at slashfood. I am dumb.

You can read the whole thing at the above link, but here's a summary. Slashfood links the article and asks their readers what they think. A few pretty knowledgeable people chime in with "actually, coffee's really varied and interesting!" a few people chime in with "bah, sounds like a bunch of wannabe snobs making things up" and "their killing the joy!" (This last one really hurts... there's really no reason to do what I do other than the joy... Why would I ever want to kill it?!? But sigh I do understand why people, sadly, suspect this.)

Anyway, in the process of a pretty standard series-of-tubes debate, there began an interesting back-and-forth between Peter Lynagh of Terroir, Nick Cho, and Greg Sherwin who seems like a really nice and knowledgeable guy. His website (Bay Area-centered appropriately enough for this week!) is here. (He shares my taste in top SF cafés, ergo, he must be smart.) Seriously, though, the debate arose because Greg wanted to point out that cuppings, traditionally have been done by green buyers looking to spot defects before they buy coffee. He's absolutely right about this, of course. The debate arose when he seemed to assert that this somehow means that the term "cupping" cannot apply to less formal settings, like cafés or private homes. Nick and Peter begged to differ. Needless to say I'm on Nick and Peter's side. The notion that cupping is limited to defect detection totally misguided. Nick says it best when he defines cupping as a method of evaluating coffee. Exactly. But again, Greg's windmill-tilting made for interesting debate, and I hope I can meet Greg who seems totally cool even if we disagree on this one (ultimately very minor) point.

Anyway, I spent like an hour writing this response and editing it to make sure it didn't sound snotty or retarded or anything, when I really should have been sleeping (we have about 30 coffees lined up for tomorrow, plus more roasting). So I figured I might as well post the highlights here. For a full look at the antecedent comments and my entire comment, you can go here. Or you can be a regular human and stop reading about such arcane topics.... up to you.

...I do understand the point you are making, Greg, about the difference between a purchasing cupping and a public cupping (and believe me, Nick and Peter understand this very, very well, too!). You are mistaken in assuming all commercial cupping is for defects, though. Certainly that's a key aspect, and usually the first stage in the process. But many, many cupping rounds at many, many different roasteries and importing companies (and even at exporters!) all over the world are done for subtlety, nuance, sweetness, and fragrance. To take an obvious example... in the final round of the Cup of Excellence Guatemala, with nothing but amazing, clean 85-plus coffees on the table, are the judges somehow no longer "cupping," but doing "comparative tasting"? I humbly submit that you may be misguided in saying that a "comparative tasting" that's NOT a purchasing cupping is therefore not really a cupping. A public cupping may be a new(ish) iteration of cupping, with less at stake and with slurps that are a little more tentative, but people are still literally cupping the coffee. ....... I share your concern about shoe-horning wine terms into coffee ...... but coffee, I promise you, honest-to-goodness is properly evaluated on sweetness, acidity, fragrance, aroma, balance, etc.... these are not imported from the practice of wine tasting, but rather simply happen to be the relevant categories when inspecting and grading coffee. And aroma notes like honey, jasmine, mandarin, caramel, blueberry, whatever are 100% legit, believe me (I'm not saying there's no BS out there, but cuppers have to be allowed this language because it's in the durn coffee dagnabbit!). ....... Perhaps the perception that coffee terms were stolen or cribbed from wine comes more from the chronological order in which most Americans first encounter the very concept of beverage tasting. Wine first, coffee later. I honestly don't know. Also, obviously, popular writers use the wine analogy because it's familiar to their readers and at least somewhat related. I can't really see the harm in this... should they be using lunar geology analogies, or Ukrainian political analogies? But thanks for your points... It's definitely a reminder to be clear with people about what the purpose of our little adventures are and the context in which cupping developed in the first place. Finally... I know what a wasteland of poorly conveyed sentiment the internet can be and I want to stress sincerely and in a friendly way that I'm being totally straight and not trying to sneak in any snark along the way! (Though sneaking snark can be fun).

A wasteland of something, at least... I'm off to bed!

June 03, 2008

Understanding Acidity in Coffee ... (The Goggles Do Nothing!)

Normal_DSCF0095

"Acidity" is a term that I am sometimes afraid to use at public cuppings. It carries a very negative connotation in many people's minds. Many people who do not like to drink coffee claim that it is "too acidic," and worry that it will upset their stomach. When I talk about acidity for the general public, I often use code words that sound a lot nicer, like "life," "brightness," or "snap."

But a coffee with great acidity is not the same thing as a very acidic coffee. Coffee has lower acidity, on a pH scale, than most colas and diet colas and lower, in fact, than apple juice. It's simply not that acidic of a beverage, regardless of how it tastes.

But the perception remains, and there's a reason for it. The reason is this: bad coffee has bad acidity.

By "bad acidity" I mean, very simply, acidity that tastes bad. Of course, it gets very complicated very fast on a molecular level. There are many, many, many different acids present in a cup of coffee, each with its own distinct molecular composition and each with a distinct taste. But you don't have to know them all to begin to make sense of acidity.

Two major categories are organic acids and chlorogenic acids. Organic acids are our friends. Some common organic acids in the flavor of coffee include citric acid (think citrus fruits), malic acid (apples), lactic acids (often buttery flavors), and acetic acids (the major component acid of vinegar, actually). All by themselves these acids are way too intense. But mixed in with the innate sugars and other carbohydrates in roasted coffee, they provide a pleasing punch to the cup, or a refreshing kick.

Chlorogenic acids are not so great. They are present in any cup of coffee, though in what mix and in what proportion varies greatly. Generally, they are more intense in robusta than arabica, just like caffeine. Caffeic acid and quinic acid are two major chlorogenic acids. These taste pretty foul: bitter, harsh, and often metallic. Quinic acid is related to quinine, which is what gives tonic water its distinct taste. Think about the metallic punch in a gin-and-tonic and now relate that flavor to the taste of some terrible diner coffee you once had, the kind that's been sitting on a hotplate all morning... can you make the connection in your mind between those two tastes? That's quinic acid.

This latter category of acids is usually what makes people scowl when they hear the term "acidity" in relation to coffee. But, as I said, it doesn't have to be like this. Acidity can be lovely. Think of fresh squeezed orange juice, the really sweet kind; or the wonderful snappy taste of biting into a tree-ripe apple. Acidity at its best blends seamlessly with the sweetness of coffee to give you a pleasing sensation beyond the sum of its parts. When coffee judges score coffees on acidity, they are ranking the quality of the acidity, not the intensity. A very subtle, delicate acidity can score very high, just as an overpowering, sour acidity scores very low. Usually, the highest scores go to coffees that have acidity that is both salient and refined.

Organic acids are present in green coffee before it is roasted, but much of the acidity that ends up in the cup is created early on in the roasting process. But once sugars begin to caramelize, the acidity slowly goes down. As a rule of thumb, acidity goes down as coffee is roasted darker. This is a good thing if you have low-quality green coffee: you can basically cook off much of the offensive acidity. But with high-grade green, it's completely unnecessary: these coffees have a natural sweetness and are well-roasted enough to give caramel or chocolatey flavors, and only benefit from having a little citrus or apple-like snap in the cup. As the quality of green coffee arriving on the shores of the United States slowly creeps up the yumminess scale, you see more and more roasters taking their coffees a little lighter and more and more people buying these coffees. Dark roast is, of course, still exceedingly popular, but it's not the only way of dealing with "bad acidity" anymore... another solution is even more elegant: coffee with naturally good acidity!

IHasAFlavor

There's lots more to say about acidity, but this is just a primer, not a paper for a chemistry journal. Here are a few more interesting things to know about acidity in coffee...

--The higher the elevation at which the coffee was grown, the more acidity it has. Speaking very generally.

--East Africa is probably the region most associated with incredible acidity, and especially Kenya.

--Astringent, or clinging soury acidity in coffee is often associated with coffee that was picked before the cherries were ripe. Cuppers often call these coffees "greeny" or "greenish."

--The anti-oxidant health benefit of drinking coffee is actually tied to the not-so-nice-tasting chlorogenic acids, and is more prevalent in ugly robusta than lovely arabica. But don't worry... there are still plenty of anti-oxidants in coffees with subtler chlorogenics. Any body-health benefit to robusta is offset by the price you pay in soul-health by drinking it.

If you want to train yourself to better evaluate acidity, here's a great activity: go to the supermarket and buy as many different kinds of apples as they have. Then take these home and cut them up and make a little chart. Try each apple and rank it in order of sweetness and tartness (a different rank for each category). Notice how the two can balance one another. This is very similar to how sweetness and acidity interact in a cup of coffee.

Another good training tool is mix lemon juice, sugar and water in different concentrations using a blind coding system and see if you can guess which is which (like in Q-grader training)

Of course, the best training tool is just to drink coffee and to slow down and notice carefully the sensations in your mouth and your mind as you taste it. Great coffee will always reward you for this activity with pleasure. As for less-than-great coffee... who needs it, right?